• Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Rss
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Bios
  • Scotti Certified Training Programs
  • Articles
  • Contact Us!
Search
Home» Driving » Surveillance Detection and Driving

Surveillance Detection and Driving

Posted by tscotti - September 16, 2009 - Driving
0

A while back, one of the oil companies asked me to do lessons learned from a vehicle ambush. It was a two car scenario with both cars taking some hits, but no injuries. The company wanted to know why these two drivers were able to drive out of this, these are there words not mine, with relative ease.

We went to the scene of the attack with the two drivers and asked them what they saw, when did they see it, and where were they when they saw it. My conclusion was that the driver of the principal’s car had a 1 to 1.5 second jump on the incident; basically he was 1.5 seconds ahead of the ambush.

My educated guess is that if these drivers had delayed there action by .5 to 1 second that these two guys would not be standing on a street corner talking to the big gringo. The question that needs to be answered is what gave them the “extra” time.

To answer that question you need to look at the science of reaction time. According to the scientists who have done an enormous amount of research on driver reaction time the “average” driver needs 2.5 seconds from the time they see the problem to the time they react to the problem. A Dr. Green has been researching reaction time for years, if interested in the science of reaction time Google his name. Here is a small part of what he found;

Condition A – When the driver knows they have to brake they can achieve the best possible reaction time. He says that the best estimate is 0.7 second. Of this, 0.5 is perception and 0.2 is movement, the time required to release the accelerator and to depress the brake pedal.

 Condition B – When the need to brake is a complete surprise reaction time is substantially different. In this case Dr. Green suggests that the best estimate is 1.5 seconds for something that may be coming at you from the side (This attack came from the side) and a few tenths of a second faster for straight-ahead obstacles.

What does all this science stuff have to do with Surveillance Detection?  A good SD program trains you to recognize pre incident indicators and to indentify danger zones. If through a good SD program you are in Condition A – you have an extra .5 to 1 second additional time to react to the problem. In the case of my two drivers according to my calculations it gave them an extra 26 to 52 feet, enough for them to drive out of the problem.

Corporation understand the higher the risk the more Driver Training and SD work together.  Corporations throughout the globe have recognized the need for SD, next year we will be in 4 countries conducting SD programs plus the programs that we do here in the US.  

TSVDI is conducting a Surveillance Detection Program  in New Jersey. It is the same program that we conducted for corporations throughout the world.

Bodyguard, chauffeur, driver training, driving, driving skills, executive protection, high risk environment, Joe Autera, personal protection, protective driving, Scotti School, security driver, security driving, Surveillance Detection, Tony Scotti, Tony Scotti Assoc, Vehicle Dynamics Institute

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

–> Sign up for Our Monthly Newsletter

Join Our Mailing List
Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust

Recent Posts

  • Meet Janine Krewson Paul – VDI Instructor
  • FNG’S!!!!!! – By Frank Gallagher
  • Learning How to Find Job Opportunities
  • A PDF of the 2012 Executive Security International (ESI) Brochure
  • A First Person Account of a Vehicle Ambush – by Frank Gallagher

Archives

(c) 2012 - SecurityDriver.Com